April 2011


A ‘Normal’ Life That Vanished in a Terrorist Attack (NY Times, March 8th)

FRANKFURT — To hear family, friends and neighbors tell it, Arid Uka was a model youth: never involved in violence, or in trouble with the police, unlike many other young men in his predominantly immigrant neighborhood in Frankfurt.

Mr. Uka, 21, they said, was calm and quiet. In 2005, he and some classmates won a government prize for a school project on how to prevent violence in society and posed proudly with Gerhard Schröder, then chancellor of Germany.

So this young man did not succumb to the pull of criminality that swallows up so many Albanian males; instead he opted for jihad. Fitting rather neatly into one of the two categories that Srdja Trifkovic outlined for us: 1) secular, pro-Western, Washington-approved gangsters and Serb-killers. 2) Islamic terrorists (and Serb-killers). So Uka is actually better than the Ft. Dix guys, who had run-ins with the law their whole lives until they finally succumbed to the most popular racket, jihad.

The young man from Kosovo helped his mother at home, cleaned floors, took out the trash and even gave her half his salary for the pilgrimage to Mecca.

He was a devout Muslim who prayed five times a day, but also liked to play video games on a PlayStation and watch “The Simpsons” with his brothers, 27 and 12.

Pause. Considering that the usual explanation given about jihadist-minded Albanians is that they’ve been radicalized like any number of “other Western” Muslims and it has nothing to do with their Kosovo identity; considering that an Albanian’s increased religiosity that leads him to violence usually takes place outside of parental guidance (see the Ft. Dix boys); and considering we were told that the “Kosovars” aren’t religious, what was this boy’s mother doing taking half her son’s earnings to fund her trip to Mecca? It was THAT important to a non-Muslimy Albanian? Then again, the grandfather is an imam in Kosovo.

“He was always thinking about others first and then about himself,” said his mother, Fevzije, 53. According to her, he wanted to become an engineer, have a family and live a normal life.

But last Wednesday, that vision of normal life vanished. German security officials say Mr. Uka perpetrated the first terrorist attack on German soil since Sept. 11, 2001, killing two American airmen and wounding two other men in anger at the U.S. deployment in Afghanistan…

Hey Germany, let’s just make a mental note here: The first post-9/11 terrorist attack on German soil was committed by an Albanian from Kosovo. So maybe 9/11 was a cause to reevaluate your war on their behalf two years earlier and your ongoing policies in the Balkans? As opposed to being anti-terror only outside the Balkans?

Mr. Uka’s 27-year-old brother, Hastrid, said his brother had never shown hatred toward anyone. The two brothers arrived with their mother in Germany when Arid was four years old; their grandfather was an imam in their native Kosovo, but they had been raised to respect other religions; Hastrid’s girlfriend is Jewish, and all three would go to the movies.

Indeed, as noted on this site repeatedly, Albanian Muslims don’t have it in for Jews. In many senses, Albanian defenders are right when they say, “They’re not like that.” The problem is that they create their own, mutated version of “like that.” I suppose I can admit that Albanian jihadism is a bit more charming than that of the soulless, glassy-eyed mujahideen, so I can see why Westerners get confused and even find them endearing. There is a bit of the wacky Balkan charm in them. But once Albanian stop confusing themselves and us, they’re going to get more dangerous.

The family exuded pride that Arid went to high school. “Our dream was to buy a house and live all together with our families one day,” said Hastrid Uka, who like his father is a roofer.

Whether Arid actually finished high school is unclear. He told his family that he had been unable to get an engineering job at a big chemical company last year, so he did social service at the Green Crescent, a Frankfurt group that cares for elderly Muslim immigrants with no family.

Moustafa Shahin, head of the Green Crescent, said he had a school report for Arid Uka only for the 2007-2008 year.

“He was a hardworking person. He did not talk much,” Mr. Shahin said. “He was very loved by the patients and was always on time for the job.”

Last December, Mr. Uka told Mr. Shahin he was quitting because he needed another job to support his family. He then went to work at the post office.

“It’s incomprehensible what happened here,” Mr. Shahin said. “It is totally opposite to how we have known him.”

At the Uka home, the phone rang continuously. Family members and friends seek answers. The family says it has none.

“I am trying to find an answer but I can’t,” said Arid’s father, Murat Uka, asking a reporter whether the dead men had families, of what age. “We are so sorry,” he and Hastrid repeated.

Mr. Uka was born in Kosovska Mitrovica, but his brother said they had known the former Yugoslav province only from vacations. A family video showed Arid there last year with his mother and 12-year-old brother, Kosovar. Arid, a tall, thin young man with shoulder-length hair, smiled shyly into the camera. “He didn’t like to be filmed much,” his mother said. “So sometimes I had to take surprising pictures.”

Is the boy really named…Kosovar?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

And he’s 12 years old, which means he was born in 1999 — that is, the same year the nationality was spontaneously born. At least they didn’t name him “Albanian,” though that would have been more authentic and accurate.

By all accounts, Mr. Uka had modest habits. “Unlike me, Arid did not spen[d] much money on clothes,” his older brother said. The apartment has one desk with a computer, where Arid and his younger brother did homework.

In their district, second-generation immigrants often face problems in school or finding a job. But Hastrid Uka insisted: “We had a good childhood and our friends came from all nationalities and religions.”

His father added: “Our children were brought up as Muslims, but also as people who respect others no matter what religion they have.”

According to German security officials and prosecutors, the Internet may have played a major role in Mr. Uka’s radicalization. His Facebook page hints at a side of him his family apparently did not know. He posted a link to a jihadist battle hymn: “I can no longer stand this life of humiliation among you. My weapon is ready at all times.”

A German security official who is involved in the investigation but not authorized to speak about it said that Arid Uka had been friends with men known for their radical interpretation of Islam.

But Boris Rhein, the interior minister for the state of Hesse where the airport is situated, said there was no evidence the suspect was part of a larger group, though he added that there was evidence he had targeted U.S. military personnel for ideological reasons.

According to the prosecutor in the case, Mr. Uka told investigators that he had acted alone and that he had decided to carry out the attack after seeing a video on YouTube that apparently showed American soldiers raping a girl in Afghanistan. There is indeed a video that was posted recently on several jihadist forums and is still available that shows men in U.S. uniforms appearing to rape a young woman.

His family said they heard about the video for the first time from the media. “We had no idea about this — but maybe my brother thought it is true and he lost it,” his older brother said.

In Washington, a Pentagon spokesman said the YouTube video was the work of extremists. “It’s clearly part of a propaganda video and contains no reference to when or where the video was shot,” said Col. David Lapan, the spokesman. “How does one determine if it’s authentic and/or investigate?”

The Uka family has not yet seen Arid. “I want to ask Arid, if he has really done it,” said his father with tears in his eyes. “I will ask him: my son, why did you kill?”

Because. Because if you’re from a culture that’s used to killing, it’s hard to get out of the habit. And if you’re in a country where Serbs aren’t as plentiful, you’re going to kill whatever is nearest. But that’s less legal than killing Serbs, so for the first time Albanians are dealing with consequences of killing.

Meanwhile, don’t journalists ever get tired of writing the same article every time a Muslim kills?

Note also this twice-stated point: ‘We’re Muslims, but we respect others regardless of their religion.’ This is Muslims openly admitting that Muslims do not have regard for non-Muslims.

[Links added.]

Hello again Julia, well as I told you before I’m Catholic, although I think that the Western Society has been very hard with the Serbs.

There’s no doubt that there’s a conspiracy against Serbia by the West, the West fostered the Euro as an official currency in Montenegro (when countries even within the European Union were not [yet using] it) for giving the Idea that Montenegro should be Independent from Serbia. Later in 2006 a manipulated referendum was promoted for the independence of Montenegro from the Federation, and in 2009 Montenegrin [was approved] as an official language when Serbian was always the official language even in the Kingdom of Montenegro. Inventing in 2009 a language that doesn’t exist.

It was obvious that the West fostered the Independence of Montenegro [to] leave Serbia without an outlet to the sea. I would ask my Italian friends if they would like their country fragmented in 20 new countries if we regard that [it] was never reunited until the 19th century and that there are about 20 real dialects in Italy that could be promoted with the status of real languages. I bet that Italians wouldn’t like that; that’s what the West is doing with Serbia.

Thank you for what you said to me: “You’re a good Christian for not thinking me anti-Catholic. It’s hard to convince people that I’m not anti-Catholic even when I condemn the historical actions of the Vatican. I understand that the Vatican is a mysterious operation even to the faithful, but they often take it personally when people speak or write against it. I adore Italian Catholics for standing up to the Vatican. And any Catholic who figured out what happened to the Serbs (with Vatican help) is truly exceptional, as you are.”

I’m gonna answer you: I’m Catholic but I have common sense and I recognize the historical crimes committed by the Catholic Church and lately the Church have admitted some mistakes committed by it, well of course that the Catholic authorities are corrupt, they hide many things, they don’t take measures to fight child sexual abuse etc., of course that the Catholic Church is a mysterious society, but it’s the Institution [that] fails, for me the most important it’s the Faith. I have recently discovered your articles and the fact that you condemn the historical actions of the Vatican is positive and I don’t take it as anti-Catholic because I try to be analytic.

For me Orthodox Christian people are our brothers as well as protestants, but I feel that there is an anti-Orthodox sentiment in the West sponsored by media and I don’t know why.

Julia, to me the the Real Danger is Islam!, and the U.S. government is contributing to its expansion by helping Bosnians, Albanians, Chechnyans, Dagestanis, Turkish, etc.

Islam is a criminal religion that orders the assassination of non-Islamics and their subjugation, a religion that violates human rights and mainly woman rights. The Sharya Law is absurd, stoning women for adultery?, cutting the thief’s hands?, what a horror my God!

I know that Muhammed was a pedophile, a polygamous, a criminal who expanded his religion by war, a man who massacred Jews and Christians.

I’m a Catholic Mexican and I haven’t been directly in contact with Islam, practically there is not Islam in Mexico but I know [a] few foreign people from Islamic countries here, what I know from Islam comes from from what I have observed since I was a teen, I started reading about Yugoslavia and I noticed that Kosovo, Bosnia and Macedonia (with a large Muslim population) were highly underdeveloped if compared with the rest of Yugoslavia, I observed the same with the Islamic Republics of the Soviet Union, they were very backward compared with the rest of Soviet Union, I also noticed a high birth rate in those Muslim regions, the development difference between Muslim and not Muslim populations was very huge in the same country (samples: Yugoslavia and Soviet Union).

It made me curious and I started reading about Islam but everything was twisted: like Islam a religion of peace, then I started reading the Koran (translated into Spanish) directly and I realized with my own eyes how Criminal and Medieval this religion. Only lately I started to find the truth about Islam on the Web.

I don’t want Albania, Kosovo and Bosnia into the European Union.

I don’t want the world to be like Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iran. And the terrorists intend to expand Islam through Albania, Kosovo, Bosnia, Chechnya, Dagestan. Their last goal is establishing a World Caliphate.

Sincerely yours!
Gamalieth

The coming Balkan war: Hague conviction of Croatian general rekindles designs for ‘Greater Serbia’

By Jeffrey T. Kuhner, Washington Times, Apr. 19

Croatia is headed toward another war. The Balkans - again - will explode with violence. It is only a matter of time. And the so-called “international community” has been pivotal in stoking the flames of ethnic conflict.

TRANSLATION: Because a popular Croatian general has been sentenced to 24 years for war crimes instead of another Serbian general getting sentenced to 46 years, this is cause for war.

Recently, the [ICTY] sentenced Croatian Gen. Ante Gotovina to 24 years in prison. The ICTY’s ruling rightly has sparked angry protests across Croatia.

Gen. Gotovina has been convicted for having “command responsibility” over an August 1995 military campaign, known as Operation Storm, that effectively ended the Croat-Serbian war. The ICTY alleges that the Croatian general oversaw the expulsion of 100,000 ethnic Serbs and the murder of hundreds of civilians. According to the United Nations war crimes court, the campaign constituted a “joint criminal enterprise.”

The ICTY’s verdict is preposterous and outrageous. Gen. Gotovina is not a war criminal; rather, he is a Croatian patriot and hero whose campaign restored Croatia’s territorial integrity. Moreover, it delivered a decisive blow to the late Serbian strongman Slobodan Milosevic’s dream of a “Greater Serbia.”

OH YEAH — that 1990s Greater Serbia design that has always existed exclusively in the pages of the media. To re-quote Andy Wilcoxson who, unlike Kuhner, has been actually paying attention to the Hague proceedings for MORE THAN A DAY: “Even if the Bosnian Serbs had secretly been fighting for a “Greater Serbia,” they would have needed the cooperation of Slobodan Milosevic and the Serbian government in Belgrade — which was not forthcoming.”

From 1991 until 1995, Milosevic’s marauders rampaged across the region. He used the disintegration of Yugoslavia - a synthetic multinational state - to advance his goal of establishing a Great Serbian empire stretching from the Danube to the Adriatic.

Unlike the “non-synthetic,” ethnically pure state of Croatia? Whose borders — claimed and therefore legitimized by the Croats — were communist-delineated when they weren’t Nazi-delineated. Meanwhile, Croatians sure didn’t have a problem with that synthetic Yugoslav state when they voluntarily signed on to it, accepting an over-generous accommodation offered by the victorious Serbs to their WWI-era haters and enemies based on Slavic unity. Like the Slovenes, the Croats took the deal and immediately got to work undermining the country to get their independent state anyway, with their first international sponsor being Adolf Hitler and their next one being a newly reunified Germany, along with the Vatican and America.

In Croatia, Serbian paramilitaries - aided and abetted by the Yugoslav army - waged a brutal war of aggression. The result: A third of Croatia’s territory was annexed, more than 180,000 Croatians were ethnically cleansed, and nearly 20,000 civilians were murdered. Milosevic’s aim was to unite the truncated parts of Croatia with the nearly 70 percent of territory his forces had carved out in neighboring Bosnia. Call it state-building through genocidal partition.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Not wanting one’s ears, fingers, eyes and nose to become Croatian jewelry again while all the Nazi symbols, street names, currency and flag start reemerging everywhere as one is being fired from government jobs and suddenly getting reduced parliamentary representation — is a “war of aggression,” according to this nationalist psycho. Does Kuhner have Serbs confused with Croats, whom it takes mega willpower to let a Serb pass in their presence without knifing it? Yes, I said “it.” That’s the status of a Serb in Zagreb (Remember: To be a Serb in Zagreb is to be a pig in Tehran.) Meanwhile, expecting to stay a citizen of the country that one was a citizen of the day before — unreasonable! The federalists become the “rebels”!

As Canadian former ambassador to Bulgaria, Albania and Yugoslavia, James Bissett, explained in a longer version of his article last year:

Germany has always looked upon Croatia as a traditional ally and actively supported Croatia’s desire to separate from Yugoslavia and declare independence. When fighting erupted between Croatian armed forces and the Yugoslav Federal army, Germany openly championed the Croatian cause and promoted the recognition of Croatian independence. Despite serious reservations by fellow EU members, Germany’s will prevailed….

The recognition of Croatian independence changed the nature of the conflict. The secessionist Croats suddenly acquired sovereign legitimacy while the federalist Serbs became rebels in their ancestral land. Subsequently, they were treated as such by the international community.

In April 1990, when Franjo Tudjman and his Croatian Democratic Party came to power in Croatia with an undisguised platform of separation from Yugoslavia, the Serbian population in Croatia had cause for concern. Tudjman’s party had resurrected many of the old Ustashi symbols and slogans and made it clear it was not interested in treating the Serbs as equals. A new constitution was enacted that designated Serbs as a minority group and hundreds were dismissed from their jobs; others were forced to sign a loyalty oath to the Zagreb regime.

The Serbian regions of Croatia had no desire to separate from Yugoslavia in favor of living under their slayers and, fearing a repetition of what had happened to their forefathers fifty years before, formed an autonomous region. When Croatia declared independence in May 1991 armed clashes broke out and the Yugoslav army intervened on behalf of the Serbian federalists.

Fighting was only brought to an end in January 1992 when President Milosevic of Serbia and President Tudjman signed a ceasefire leading to a United Nations peace plan and the creation of four “Protected Areas” in the Serbian parts of Croatia. With some exceptions the ceasefire was generally respected and few major engagements occurred.

However, during the next two and a half years, the United States openly supported the Croatian cause and by providing weapons, equipment, training and professional expertise enabled Croatia to build a formidable and modern military force. In May 1995 the new Croat army overran the Serbian region of western Slavonia and on August 4, 1995, aided by US air strikes against Serb positions, launched “Operation Storm” in the historic Serb region of the Krajina — designed, as stated by President Tudjman, to inflict such blows “that the Serbs will to all practical purposes disappear.”

And disappear they did. It is estimated that at least 200,000 Serbs fled Croatia and many of those that did not flee were killed. A European Union monitoring team reported on August 11, 1995 that “…an average of six corpses a day, continues to emerge, some fresh, some decomposed, mainly of old men. Many have been shot in the head or had their throats slit, others have been mutilated.” It would seem the insane violence of the new Ustashi matched that of their predecessors of 1941-45.

Operation storm was described by Carl Bildt, the former UN Special Envoy to the Former Yugoslavia as, “the most efficient ethnic cleansing we’ve seen in the Balkans.” The Serbs were, in effect, abandoned by Slobodan Milosevic, who ordered them not to resist. President Tudjman was the victor and Croatia is still today essentially “Serb-free.”

I’ll have to check my files to see what Kuhner thinks he means by 180,000 Croatians cleansed and 20,000 civilians “murdered” (I believe 20,000 is the overall death toll of the war on both sides), but it’s interesting that 180,000 Croatians count as “cleansed,” but 250,000 Serbs do not. (As we know, those who did not flee — mostly the elderly and disabled — were in fact killed with great enthusiasm.) Back to Kuhner:

Operation Storm put a stop to all of this. Gen. Gotovina’s army launched a U.S.-backed offensive that was a stunning success: Civilian casualties were minimized, the campaign lasted just three days, and the crushing defeat of the rebel [there it is!] Serbs eventually paved the way for the signing of the 1995 Dayton Peace Accords.

A stunning success! Serben-rein in JUST 3 DAYS! The atom bomb in Nagasaki put an end to WWII, and Operation Storm “put a stop to all of this!” — the difference being that the latter conflict was ended in favor of the bellicose party, and evil triumphed.

Moreover, numerous media outlets - The Washington Times, the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and the Jerusalem Post - have investigated Operation Storm and have concluded that Gen. Gotovina is innocent of any wrongdoing. He never personally ordered or tolerated the commission of any crimes. In fact, the ICTY’s prosecution was dismal on this point. It failed to show any kind of proof that Gen. Gotovina was responsible for orchestrating a criminal conspiracy…

Ditto for the Serbs whose convictions and draconian sentencing — on flimsier grounds than Khuner perceives Gotovina’s to be on — Kuhner hasn’t had a problem with.

The orders to evacuate the Serbian population from the so-called “Krajina” zone of occupation came from Belgrade several days before the commencement of Operation Storm. Milosevic, realizing he was facing a military humiliation, ordered Croatia’s Serbs transferred to Bosnia and Kosovo to consolidate his revanchist gains there. This was done before Croatian forces even launched their campaign.

Indeed, Milosevic was telling the Krajina Serbs to not fight. Just run. Which is why Serbian paramilitary leader “Captain Dragan” wanted to freaking assassinate Milosevic. One certainly wonders how that “order” from Milosevic — who as president of Serbia and not Yugoslavia wasn’t in a position to give Croatian Serbs any “orders” — jibes with Kuhner’s assessment that he was going for a Greater Serbia. If he had been, it’d certainly make the bad blood between him and Captain Dragan all the more head-scratching. As for “realizing he was facing a military humiliation, [Milosevic] ordered Croatia’s Serbs transferred to Bosnia and Kosovo to consolidate his revanchist gains there”: Again, what military humiliation in Croatia could a Serbian president be facing? Kuhner is attributing strategies where there was only retreat, defeat and no will to fight; he’s just coming up with ways to make the unwieldy facts fit his creative interpretation of events — and attributing them all to Milosevic as our ignoramus pop presses do. You think maybe that, more likely than a military defeat, what might have elicited a suggestion that Serbs run for their lives was that the Yugoslavian government got wind of this meeting between Tudjman and his generals — including, of course, Gotovina:

Tudjman is planning the operation [Storm] together with his top military brass… ‘We have to inflict such blows that the Serbs will to all practical purposes disappear.’ …Tudjman explains that, for the benefit of propaganda in the international community, leaflets should be given to Serbian civilians saying, ‘We are appealing to you not to withdraw…This means giving them a way out, while pretending to guarantee civil rights etc.’

(More Croatian planning for ethnic cleansing and murder here.)

Back to the sour Croat:

Hence, the entire Gotovina conviction and prosecution rests on a giant fraud: The removal of the Serbian population occurred under the explicit command of local Serb authorities acting under the authority of Belgrade. Therefore, Croatian forces could not have committed “ethnic cleansing.” The ICTY verdict is a sham.

Ah, so 18 years into the ICTY’s sham existence, the man notices that it’s a sham. Funny, it wasn’t a sham ’til his kin got burned. Anyone who has been following the slanted proceedings (which up ’til now had suited Kuhner just fine), would realize that this verdict is more of an attempt to de-sham, if only for show — so that the Serbs “stop whining” about bias.

The U.N. court is a politicized vehicle that aspires to render history’s final judgment on the Balkan wars of the 1990s. And its verdict is clear: All sides were guilty of atrocities; no party - or nation - was more responsible than the other. This is what Serbia has been demanding for years. It has sought to cover its genocidal culpability and national shame with moral equivalence.

Actually, moral equivalence is as good as can be hoped for, and what the Serbs are settling for. Since the real aggressors (Croats, Bosnian-Muslims, Albanians and Slovenes) — will NEVER be named as such. As for covering one’s genocidal culpability and shame, how’s that apology for exterminating Serbs in WWII coming along, Kuhner? It’s only been 70 years. Take your time.

Of course, when Serbs are accused of ethnic cleansing for busing women, children and elderly out of Srebrenica to safety (as opposed to going “Croatian” on them) this bothers Kuhner not at all. When an Orthodox bishop obliges a request by international forces to bus out Muslim women, children and old people from a town in Herzegovina, and soon after is threatened with getting hauled in for charges of “ethnic cleansing,” no “sham” there, huh, Kuhner? As long as the targets of international “justice” are the same people who were the targets of the Croats, Bosniaks and Albanians, nothing is noticeably askew at Den Haag or its affiliates.

Hence, the Gotovina conviction is a major triumph for Belgrade. Already, Serbian revanchists are claiming that the ICTY’s ruling enables Croatia’s international borders to be altered. Led by the odious Tomislav Nikolic, Belgrade’s nationalists are surging in the polls. They are demanding the restoration of a Greater Serbia. The ICTY has shown them the way forward: If Croatia’s war for independence was a “joint criminal enterprise,” then the entire Croatian state - by that twisted logic - is founded upon war crimes and ethnic cleansing.

And all along, while the Bosnian-Muslims have been doing the exact same thing to de-legitimize Republika Srpska (albeit with less legal standing than exists against the genocidal Croatian state), Kuhner doesn’t notice. Indeed, he no doubt toes his kindred Muslim spirits’ line on that front.

This is why Croatia’s ruling party, the HDZ, should never have sent Gen. Gotovina to The Hague. That it was a precondition for Zagreb’s entry into the European Union only underscores how reckless and contrary to Croatia’s national interests fast-track European Union membership is. The HDZ claims it will help Gen. Gotovina’s legal team with the verdict’s appeal. This is a dollar short and a day late. The ICTY is a kangaroo court determined to make an example out of the Croatian general. His fate is sealed no matter what the Croatian government does - and HDZ leaders know this.

The HDZ regime is fundamentally treasonous. After having won the war, Zagreb is losing the peace. The HDZ has betrayed Gen. Gotovina, the country’s veterans and Croatia’s hard-won [ill-won] independence. It has sold Croatia down the river in a mad dash to appease Brussels. The HDZ must be defeated, swept into the dustbin of history and replaced with a new conservative party - one that will provide voters with a real patriotic-populist option.

TRANSLATION: The supremacist Croats need an even more nationalist option than the HDZ to surge in the polls than what they’ve already got — yet it’s Nikolic who’s the ‘odious nationalist’ and — oh no! — surging in the polls. As for appeasing Brussels, it seems — predictably — that Kuhner can’t handle even a taste of the identity-, security- and freedom-evisceration that the quisling Serbian regime has been serving up for Brussels and Washington for over a decade. Of course, the Croats are Nazis, so they could do with a little identity-evisceration.

Croatians must demand that Zagreb end its unconditional cooperation with the ICTY, withdraw its bid to join the EU, free Gen. Gotovina, have all cases at The Hague transferred to domestic courts and insist that the ICTY stop its assault on Croatia’s territorial legitimacy. In short, it is time to put Croatia first.

Right, because Croatians don’t already put Croatia first, second, and third. They don’t even sleep without thinking about their Croatian-ness. And yes, transfer the cases to that always reliable, impartial Croatian judiciary that’s been holding up its EU bid in the first place. (Though I agree that the EU isn’t a good thing — for anyone in it.)

The ICTY’s ruling has given ultranationalist Serbs what they want: another shot at splintering Croatia. The winds of war are blowing. Handing over Gen. Gotovina to The Hague was a colossal mistake. Zagreb will rue the day.

So the Balkan nation that has been the second-most recalcitrant cooperator with the Hague (Albania/Kosovo gets first place) — and while it’s been good and proper and compulsory that the Serbs cooperate with this sham institution — now needs to remove any and all cooperation. This long-coming, more justifiable target of the Hague gets just the slightest taste of the far more unrelenting persecution by the Hague that its neighbor Serbia has been dealing with for a much longer time, and — big surprise — its supremacist champions can’t handle it.

By the way, put me in a roomful of “ultranationalist Serbs ™” over Croatian “Democrats” any day.

The obvious question remains, but will never be entertained by the likes of Kuhner: Why is it OK for Croatians to defend and celebrate their national heroes-slash-war-criminals as Kuhner does, but that sort of thing gets bad press only when Serbs do it? The latter being at least as “shammily” convicted.

A few excerpts about the lovely Croatia and its systems that Kuhner has so much confidence in:

“…a country that long overlooked or justified crimes committed by its own people in the 1991-95 Serbo-Croat war.”
– Associated Press, May 30, 2008

“Croatia for years declined to prosecute its own, claiming that only Serbs committed crimes in the war.”
– Associated Press, June 18, 2007

“In general, ethnic bias continued to affect the investigation and prosecution by the Croatian judiciary of wartime human rights violations. There continued to be widespread impunity for crimes allegedly committed by members of the Croatian Army and police forces.”
– Amnesty International on the Croatian justice system, reviewing the year 2006

To the authorities in Croatia:
• War crimes prosecutions need to be brought without regard to ethnicity.
• Croatia should enhance efforts to investigate and prosecute incidents in which ethnic Croats were responsible for crimes against ethnic Serbs.
• Charging standards and sentencing practice should be the same for all defendants, regardless of their ethnic origin. Croatian prosecutors should cease the practice of indicting Serbs for war crimes on the basis of minor offences, where Croats alleged to have committed the same acts are not charged.
• Croatia should not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity in hiring judges. Returnee Serbian judges should not be discriminated against and should have an opportunity for employment in Croatian courts.

— 2004 HRW recommendations to Croatia

Glavas Case Raises Concerns About Croatian Judiciary
(Institute for War and Peace Reporting, Sept. 22, 2006)

…Branimir Glavas, a former general and member of parliament who has been one of the most powerful politicians in Croatia over the past 15 years, is accused of crimes against Serb civilians in Osijek, a city in eastern Slavonia near the border with Serbia, during the Croatian war in 1991.

The Zagreb District Court’s handling of the matter has been criticised as lax….Three months after the investigation into his case began, Glavas is still a free man, despite repeated requests from prosecutors to place him in custody…the accused is impeding the investigation by intimidating witnesses into changing their testimony.

But the Zagreb judge leading the investigation, Zdenko Posavec, has turned down all requests for custody, saying there is no proof that Glavas was behind any threats.

Charges brought against Glavas after a year-long investigation conducted by leading crime scene expert Vladimir Faber include the murder of at least two Serb civilians and the unlawful detention and mistreatment of many others.

The investigation followed claims by Krunoslav Fehir, a former member of a Croatian unit under Glavas’s command, that the general ordered gruesome extrajudicial executions of Serbs in Osijek.

Fehir alleged that Glavas ordered civilians to be imprisoned in his wartime headquarters, the National Defence Secretariat, where they were interrogated, tortured and finally killed. The alleged acts of torture included forcing acid from car batteries down their throats.

Fehir, who was only 16 at the time, admitted taking part in these crimes. He told Croatian investigators that one of the detainees, Cedomir Vuckovic, died shortly after he was forced to drink acid. He said that another Serb who had seen what happened, Djordje Petkovic, was executed on Glavas’s order. Petkovic’s body was never found.

Faber was dispatched from Zagreb to investigate allegations of war crimes in the city, because it had become apparent that the local police force would not be able to do so. The investigation was then shifted from Osijek to Zagreb for the sake of impartiality. [Or, at least, ‘lesser partiality.’]

Despite the serious nature of the accusations, there is no sign that Glavas will be arrested any time soon. Investigating judge Zdenko Posavec even allowed Glavas to travel to Germany this summer to watch the football World Cup.

According to police in Osijek, former soldiers who served under Glavas subsequently threatened some of the witnesses, leading the state prosecutor to demand his arrest – with no success.

“The case of Glavas and Fehir causes great concern and raises questions about Croatia’s ability to conduct war crimes investigations efficiently,” said Mary Wyckoff, who heads the law department of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s mission in Zagreb…“The investigative procedure should strengthen the public’s confidence in state institutions responsible for criminal investigations and proceedings. If this procedure is conducted properly, then its results – whatever they are - will be accepted as legitimate,” she explained. [Except that we’re dealing with a Croatian public, and it’s the opposite of impartiality that inspires confidence here.]

Because of the way the whole case has been handled, many observers suggest it has descended into farce.

Several legal experts told IWPR it was “scandalous” that Glavas has been allowed to defend himself as a free man. They argue that there are grounds for immediate detention, specifically the gravity of the allegations and the indications that the accused has used his liberty to influence witnesses.

Several witnesses who were questioned by the investigating judge have already significantly altered the original testimonies they gave to police.

Glavas even threatened some witnesses in the presence of investigative judge Posavec.

Ladislav Bognar, a university professor who was in the area where Glavas was in charge at the time of the events of 1991, says he found himself in an alarming position when he gave a statement to the authorities.

“Since the things I was saying were not really in Glavas’s favour, he attacked me right in front of judge Posavec. He called me a communist bastard and said I would get what I deserved,” said Bognar.

Glavas did not stop there – he launched his own web site on which he started posting witness testimonies. He stopped only when the investigating judge asked him to remove the material from the internet.

But he still used his website and media appearances to insult Faber, the investigating police officer, calling him “an immoral freak” and “human trash”. Nor did he spare other officials, calling State Prosecutor Mladen Bajic “rotten as a rotten tooth” and describing the judiciary as corrupt and politically influenced.

“I would much rather be tried in Banja Luka in Republika Srpska, because their judiciary is much more honest than Croatia’s,” he said in one of his public outbursts. […]

(Meanwhile, the force-feeding of battery acid to Serbs reminds me of the case of Azra Basic, the Kentucky woman whom Kuhner might have become fast friends with if she hadn’t been arrested last month on an Interpol warrant for making Serbs drink gasoline and drink blood from another Serb whose throat she’d slit — and made them eat Yugoslav currency. She also burned Serb faces, made prisoners crawl along broken glass, pulled out teeth and fingernails, cut off ears and enjoyed forehead-carving. One certainly wonders why Kuhner didn’t see fit to speak up in defense of this Croatian heroine.)

Amnesty chides Croatia for war crime probe failure (AP, Dec. 8, 2010)

Amnesty International on Thursday accused Croatia of failing to prosecute war crimes quickly and impartially, saying many perpetrators of brutalities may never face trial because of the country’s lack of will to investigate its painful history. [By which it means ‘pain-inflicting.’]

Despite promises by the government to aggressively probe war crimes committed during the country’s bloody 1991-1995 ethnic war with Serb rebels, the country only closes 18 cases each year, with about 700 cases yet to be prosecuted and many likely never to come to trial, the human rights watchdog said in a new report.

“Croatia must deal with its past in order to move forward” said Nicola Duckworth, Amnesty’s Europe and Asia director….Though there has been some progress, “justice has been slow in coming and very selective.”

The country has been reluctant to investigate the ethnic Croat majority, with three quarters of the accused being ethnic Serbs, the report said. Public allegations against several senior Croatian political and military officials - including the deputy speaker of parliament, for instance - have not been investigated, it said.

“Impunity for war crimes is a stumbling block toward membership” in the EU, Duckworth said.

Croatia long insisted that Serbs were the sole perpetrators of atrocities during the war, which began when the country’s minority Serbs rebelled against Croatia’s independence from Yugoslavia. That stance changed in 2000, when pro-Western governments began launching proceedings against some Croats, resulting in war crimes convictions of at least three senior officials and dozens of soldiers. […]

“Croatia refuses to hand over general accused of war crimes” (Guardian, Sept. 26, 2002)

Showdown with UN looms after indictment for massacre of Serbs in 1993 is defied

Croatia is engaged in a high-risk showdown with the United Nations war crimes tribunal in the Hague after refusing to hand over a former army chief indicted for war crimes against Serb civilians and wounded soldiers in 1993.

General Janko Bobetko, 83, who has retired, is the oldest person to be indicted by the tribunal and the most senior Croatian official demanded for extradition by the Hague.

[President Stipe] Mesic, a supporter of the Hague tribunal and a discreet critic of the Croatian government’s attempts to stall the handover of Gen Bobetko, will find himself presenting evidence against Mr Milosevic while his government is on the brink of breaking off cooperation with the court.

Gen Bobetko has robustly dismissed the charges. He and his many supporters are seeking to paint the indictment of an individual as an assault on Croatia. [See this tactic employed by their Albanian fellow nationalist-supremacists in Kosovo, vis-a-vis the murder-for-organs scandal.]

Army generals are picketing the government on his behalf and the Croatian Catholic church is urging the country to defy the international community.

An opinion poll yesterday found that 84% of Croats backed Gen Bobetko and almost as many favoured abandoning cooperation with the Hague. [One wonders if the other 16% are still breathing.]

The rightwing opposition, heirs to the late authoritarian president, Franjo Tudjman, is demanding constitutional changes to insulate Croats against the tribunal.

So that would place a Washington Times columnist named Jeffrey Kuhner in the category of heir to Franjo Tudjman, who was an admirer of the Ustashe Nazis and an open advocate of ethnic cleansing.

Since the indictment bombshell was dropped last Friday, Gen Bobetko has repeatedly asserted that he will not be taken to the Hague alive.

A parade of prominent supporters [has] visited his luxury villa in Zagreb to demonstrate solidarity.

Although Gen Bobetko has admitted in his memoirs to the key role that his army played beyond Croatia in the 1992-95 war in Bosnia, the charges against him relate to a lightning Croatian army raid in the Medak pocket, south-west of Zagreb, in September 1993.

Serb separatist rebels [sic: the Croats were the separatists; Serbs were the opposite: federalists] had held the area since early in the war in 1991, but were flushed out in a matter of hours. The general did not take part in the battle, but was in overall charge.

The indictment says that scores of houses of Serb civilians were deliberately destroyed and that around 100 Serb civilians and wounded combatants were killed.

The former army chief faces charges on five counts of crimes against humanity; he is alleged to have been aware of the unlawful killings in September 1993 and to have done nothing to prevent them or to subsequently call those responsible to account.

“No government can challenge an indictment,” said Florence Hartmann, spokeswoman for the chief prosecutor, Carla Del Ponte.

But the government is doing just that, walking a tightrope and anxious to avoid a full-blown political dispute with the Hague while opening “a legal dispute”.

It argues that the events of September 1993 were a legitimate police operation to “combat terrorism” on sovereign and internationally recognised Croatian territory, and that the aim was not “ethnic cleansing” of the indigenous Serb population. [Yet again! Just as in Storm, “ethnic cleansing” wasn’t the aim at all!]

Cardinal Josip Bozanic, the powerful archbishop of Zagreb and the head of the Croatian Catholic church, called on the country yesterday to “unite in the face of the external pressure”.

Which of course brings us to the Croatian Catholic Church. Before announcement of the verdicts this month, the Croatian Catholic Church — and I do mean to differentiate this mutant critter from the Catholic Church at large even if the Vatican is disturbingly reluctant to do so — called on Croatians to fast and pray for acquittals or close to it.

What other church does this? What other church is this inseparable from, and intertwined with, nationhood? And vice versa: what country is this inseparable from the church? What other church involves itself with, and is so invested in, the fate of war criminals?

Unless, of course, we’re talking about Islam and Muslims. Indeed, the fanaticism of the Croatian church comes second only to that much discussed phenomenon.

As a letter by Michael Pravica published in The Washington Times on Monday responded to Kuhner:

…I’m only sorry that more of the guilty weren’t prosecuted for crimes ranging from bombing fleeing columns of refugees, raping and slaughtering elderly grandmothers, beating up Orthodox Christian nuns and trying to hide the grisly evidence after wiping out entire villages with the approval, aid and encouragement of Franjo Tudjman’s government.

The greatest unresolved problem in the Balkans pertains to the largely unreported and uncompensated genocide of Serbian Orthodox Christians, Jews and Roma in Croatia during World War II. Hundreds of thousands of innocents were slaughtered, ethnically cleansed from a “Greater Croatia”…and forcibly converted to Roman Catholicism. Today’s Croatia differs little from the Croatia of that time in its hatred of anything Serbian since the country was never properly de-Nazi- fied…

If Croatia is unable to accept responsibility for crimes committed by its citizens [in both wars], Mr. Kuhner may be correct in asserting that there will be a far more vicious war between Croatia and Serbia.

I close with more from Ambassador Bissett on this point:

Croatia has never acknowledged its role in the Second World War as a loyal ally of the Nazi cause, and its ardent participation in genocide against its Serbian, Jewish and Gypsy (Roma) populations…

When Hitler’s forces invaded Yugoslavia in the spring of 1941, Croatian right wing extremists, under the leadership of Ante Pavelic and his fascist “Ustashi” movement, were given control of Croatia. Pavelic [also a national Croatian hero — just look inside any Croatian Cultural Center anywhere in the world] aligned the country enthusiastically to the Nazi cause and immediately launched a horrific onslaught against the Serbian minority. The official policy was openly expressed. It was: kill one third of the Serbs, convert another third to Catholicism and expel the remaining third from Croatia.

In the early spring and summer of 1941 thousands of innocent Serbs were slaughtered in the most barbaric fashion by Ustashi killers. Serbian orthodox churches were burned and many Serbian communities wiped out. As the war progressed, Serbs, Jews and Gypsies were interned in concentration camps where thousands of victims were slaughtered like animals by having their throats slit or beaten to death by mallets or axes.

The nature of the carnage was so horrific that senior ranking German officers in Croatia, including SS Obergruppenfuhrer Arthur [Phleps], sickened by the slaughter and worried that it was driving Serbians and anti-Ustashi Croats into the ranks of resistance groups, urged Berlin to demand a stop to the slaughter. These protests were in vain and the genocide continued. Senior Italian officers also were appalled at the killing and are on record of not only complaining but frequently offering protection to fleeing victims.

When the war ended and Tito’s communists took command of Yugoslavia, they had no desire to come to terms with or make an accounting of the dreadful events that had taken place in Croatia. Yugoslavia’s slogan was “Brotherhood and Unity.” Every effort was made to bury the past and as Yugoslavia soon became an ally in the Cold War against the Soviet Union, the Western democracies had little interest in exposing the genocide.

Twice in the twentieth century Croatia has managed to get away with violating the most basic standards of international human behavior — including genocide — without being called to account. Even today Pavelic and Tudjman are looked upon by many Croatians as national heroes, as are some of the most vicious Ustashi criminals…Crowds at Croatian soccer games and concerts flaunt Ustashi and Nazi symbols and sing old fascist chants and songs. Croatia marks August 5 as a national holiday commemorating the expulsion of the Serbs by “Operation Storm.” Croatians indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia are also hailed as defenders of the nation…

Croatia needs to purge itself of its dark past. Its prolonged denial of outrageous crimes committed in the 20th century has created what the Croatian exiled writer Dubravka Ugresic has described as a “culture of lies.” […]

Washington Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner is every bit a part of that culture. Indeed, one wonders if the ‘T’ is for Tudjman. When it comes to Croatian supremacism, Kuhner is what’s called a case study. If only the Washington Times editorial board and management could comprehend what is in their house, their blood would freeze. What they have is a ‘colleague’ who is Za Dom, Spremni! Editors, if you don’t know what that means — and naturally you don’t — it’s the WWII Croatian-Nazi slogan “For the Homeland, Ready!” — and your boy Kuhner is.

In this otherwise retarded March 25th National Post article regurgitating all the old NATO propaganda and cheering the targeting of civilian infrastructure in 1999 — plus advocating help to the Libyan rebels who he admits are Qaeda-connected — writer Lorne Gunter easily makes an admission that our political elite still won’t. Indicating that more people know this than are letting on:

There’s yet another parallel with Kosovo: The rebels we are defending may yet turn out to be our enemies.

In 1999, the Kosovo Liberation Army was our ally against the Serbs, but they were also al-Qaeda’s drug mules for opium from Afghanistan into central and Western Europe. The very people we were fighting to liberate had been criminals whom Western police agencies were attempting to drive out of business.

There’s a potential for the same in Libya. At the very least, the rebels in the eastern half of the country are said to have al-Qaeda ties. Maybe they do, maybe they don’t; but until it had a falling out with Gaddafi in the 1990s, al-Qaeda did much of its training in eastern Libya, so claims of al-Qaeda connections for the rebels are plausible.

All this is what comes from being late to the fight. Had the West intervened a week earlier, when the rebels had the upper hand, we might now not be contemplating stepping up our involvement. Back then, the rebels had the manpower and momentum to move on Gaddafi’s strongholds without Western support.

But dithering by the United States, NATO and the United Nations cost the rebels their advantage…

Huh? One wonders if he read the preceding part of his article before writing the last part.

At least God made Peter Worthington, to straighten the man out, and in the same newspaper:

Peter Worthington: Why Libya is not the new Kosovo (March 29)

Lorne Gunter, one of the wiser columnists in the media [oh shit!], opines in the National Post that there are a lot of parallels between the war in Libya and the 1999 NATO war against Serbia in Kosovo.

While there are some parallels in the air war, that’s where the comparison ends.

Kosovo was a phony war orchestrated by the U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, on the fabricated grounds that Slobodan Milosevic was waging genocide in Kosovo…Forensic people poured into “liberated” Kosovo to document genocide and exhume mass graves.

They found evidence of atrocities – both by Serbs and by the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) — but no mass graves…Last week marked the 12th anniversary of the air attack on Belgrade and select [sic] Serbian targets, yet in that 12 year period, no mass graves have been found.

Investigations showed that prior to the air war, atrocities abounded in Kosovo on roughly a 50% basis – half by Kosovars, half by Serbs.

NOTE: The investigators put it that way because they were striving for parity. In fact, even Lord Robertson admitted that before the NATO bombing, the majority of deaths were caused by the KLA; a British parliamentary inquiry concluded that until January 1999 most of the crimes were the KLA’s; according to confidential minutes of the North Atlantic Council (NAC), even William “Massacre at Racak!” Walker admitted the KLA was

“the main initiator of the violence…It has launched what appears to be a deliberate campaign of provocation”. This is how William walker himself reported the situation then, in private.

GENERAL KLAUS NAUMANN
CHAIRMAN, NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE
Ambassador Walker stated in the NAC that the majority of violations was caused by the KLA.

[Reporter ALLAN LITTLE]
Walker didn’t admit that in public at the time. He still doesn’t.

Back to Worthington:

One of the prime reasons for the war was a so-called massacre of 45 Kosovar civilians by Serbs at the town of Racak…Thanks largely to French journalists and forensic investigators from Finland, it became more likely (depending on one’s objectivity) that the Racak victims had been killed during fighting between Serbs and the KLA, and the bodies moved and arranged to appear that they’d been massacred.

Examination showed most had been killed from a distance — little evidence to indicate executions. Nonetheless, the cursory walk-through by William Walker led to charges of massacre against Milosevic which, had he not died before his trial was completed, might have been a huge embarrassment to NATO and the International Court.

The air war over Kosovo was not the U.S.’s or NATO’s finest hour. […]

After Worthington’s gentle chiding of Gunter, a slightly adjusted version of the Gunter article appeared in The Edmonton Journal. It’s only a little less stupid than the first, lamenting toward the end that the West wasn’t serious about “bringing Serbia to its knees.” Bringing Serbia to its knees? “On behalf of whom?” asks Liz, who circulated the item today. “Muslims? Why ‘target’ Serbia at all, an ally in two world wars?”

Because most people aren’t even as smart as this guy. Yikes.

Libyan conflict Kosovo war all over again

Militarily, NATO’s campaign in Libya reminds me of its 1999 war in Kosovo.

Then, as now, there was a great rush to enter the conflict, largely because of media-driven claims of human rights abuses. A dozen years ago, the allegation was ethnic cleansing of Kosovar Albanians by bloodthirsty Serbs. In Libya today, it is threats by Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi to annihilate his enemies, live, as the world watches on CNN.

In Kosovo, claims of genocide proved false. After the war had ended, several attempts were made to find the mass graves of innocent Kosovars that the Serbs had purportedly filled with corpses. Nothing was ever found on the scale described prewar, when Western voters were being sold on the need to intervene.

Investigators from the European Union in particular scoured Kosovo’s countryside in vain for years. United Nations prosecutors told their forensic investigators again and again to dip more, to find the bodies they were sure were there. But none showed up. In all, about 5,000 people were killed in the three-month war, but about equal numbers were killed by both sides.

I suspect something similar will be found in Libya years from now when the din of war permits sober analysis: Col. Gadhafi, as evil and cruel as he has been to stay in power for 41 years, was mostly engaging in bravado when he threatened to “wipe out” the rebels opposing his regime. The threat that prompted NATO’s air war against Gadhafi and his forces was no more real than Kosovarian claims [there it is! and check out “Kosovoians” here] of crimes against humanity inflicted on them by Belgrade’s forces.

But the greatest parallel between Kosovo and Libya is the feckless (and, therefore, largely useless) air campaign that is the strategic centrepiece of either war.

…I’ll admit I was rooting for those Libyans seeking to free themselves from the clutches of a brutal strongman. Who doesn’t cheer the freedom-seeking [sic: sharia-seeking] underdog? But I forgot that many on the left have no clue how to run a war once they’ve begun one.

And as we’ve seen by now, neither do those on the right. Then Gunter again goes into lamenting that we didn’t do more damage to civilians in 1999, and advocates for more Western testosterone in Libya:

In the spring of 1999, NATO spent 79 days blowing up stuff in Kosovo and Serbia on the premise that enough big, loud explosions would frighten Serbia strongman Slobodan Milosevic into capitulating to Western demands that he free Kosovo.

For at least 69 of those 79 days, the bombing was ineffectual. This was mostly due to the NATO belief it was wrong to destroy land and public works during a war and the hopeless and arrogant prediction Milosevic would be persuaded to give up power by the mere awesomeness of NATO air power…[F]or much of the war, the West was bombing barns, tractors and cattle…Milosevic and his cronies quickly figured out we weren’t serious. They then correctly calculated that if they were prepared to sustain some damage - or, more correctly, let their people sustain the damage - they could retain power more or less indefinitely.

This is what Gadhafi has figured out, too: The West is a toothless tiger in this war.

We are not always unprepared to fight seriously. We are fighting very real wars in Afghanistan and Iraq [Not!]. And part of us - the French - are fighting an actual war in Ivory Coast while at the same time helping with the phoney war in Libya. Yet occasionally, when we don’t want to look like Imperialists or bullies or Crusaders, we pull our punches in the hope our gleaming military might will win the day for us and we won’t have to resort to total war.

There is a scene from the Kosovo campaign that more than any other typified what I came to believe about that war. On day 44 or 45, ordinary Serbs demonstrated in support of the Serbian president on a bridge over the Danube at night. The remarkable features - at least from a military point of view - were that the bridge was intact six weeks into a “war” and it was well illuminated by street lights that, obviously, were still drawing reliable electrical power.

The West wasn’t serious about bringing Serbia to its knees. It was only in the air campaign’s last 10 days that NATO began targeting power stations, refineries, rail lines, bridges and water treatment plants - facilities whose destruction would squeeze the Serbians and their government.

And the war was not won until NATO inserted troops on the ground. [What? It did? Or is he talking about the peacekeeping mission that “won the war” by helping the Albanians ethnically purify the province?]

If the West is now not prepared to blow up targets that matter to Col. Gadhafi and it is not prepared to send troops, then it is not serious enough to have rattled its sabre in the first place.

There have been countless op-eds written in the past few weeks comparing Libya to Kosovo. What’s interesting is that the comparison holds regardless whether the writer is making the comparison to warn against, or to advocate in favor (i.e. the same people who were wrong about Kosovo and still don’t know it are eager to be wrong about Libya).

I’ve stayed away from the issue, not only because I’m not interested in sorting out Libya as anything other than just another pathetic and dangerous Muslim country (apologies for the redundancy), but also because absolutely nothing compares to what we did to the former Yugoslavia. HOWEVER, upon reading one of these interchangeable and forgettable Libya/Kosovo analyses, I read a sentence that made the red dye jump off my hair. It was on a US News & World Report blog, by one of those ‘legit,’ mainstream journalists — and it comes at the end of the excerpt below, though the earlier parts are also worth ridiculing:

Libya is More Like Kosovo Than Iraq or Vietnam (March 29), Susan Milligan (Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.)

No one wants “another Vietnam,” the buzzphrase for a protracted conflict with no clear mission or definition of success. And no one (anymore) wants another Iraq….Nor does anyone want another Bosnia, where the international community dithered for a year while former Yugoslav strongman Slobodan Milosevic slaughtered [sic] his own countrymen.

Libya isn’t Vietnam or Iraq or even Bosnia; it’s probably closer to Kosovo, where international intervention stopped a systematic [sic], ruthless [sic] murder [sic] of Kosovar [sic] Albanians by Milosevic as he sought to thwart an uprising by the Kosovo Liberation Army. As terrified Kosovars [sic] poured over the border into Albania, or tried to stay alive by hiding out in their basements, they would plead with foreign journalists. Where was America? Where was NATO? My translator at the time narrowly escaped death in his home town of Pec when a Serbian soldier took him behind his family home, drawing a butcher knife from its sheath and preparing to cut his throat. He was saved only by a last-second intervention by a local Serb who happened to like him (officially, the Serbs and Albanians hated each other, but inside neighborhoods, they often got along).

Indeed. As they still do in southern Serbia’s Presevo Valley, against all Albanian and international efforts to stop that. Note: There was a lot of that Serbs-saving-Albanian-neighbors going on, including by the Serbian monks and bishops who sheltered Albanians in the Serbian monasteries that Albanians have since destroyed. In contrast, there was little neighborly protection once we handed the province to the exponentially more terrifying KLA, with regular Albanians instead joining in the terrorizing.

Without saying whether she herself witnessed the following, or engaged in the standard journalistic practice of just taking the Albanian’s word for it, the writer continues:

The ethnic Albanians were then loaded onto an open cart and driven over dirt roads to the border, where they were to be deposited into Albania. En route, paramilitary attempted to pull a young woman off the cart, and her family feared she would be raped. People on the cart gripped one of her arms, while the Serbs tried to pull the other one. Angry, one of the paramilitary shot one of the men trying to protect the young woman.

As they neared the border, my translator looked to the side of the road and noted what appeared to be a pile of clothes — abandoned or stolen, he assumed, as residents were pushed out. As the cart got closer, he saw it was a pile of bodies.

And we know how reliable those KLA-provided translators are.

The NATO bombings in 1999 eventually stopped [started] the slaughter. Albanians — both in Kosovo and in Albania — were effusively grateful, painting “thanks you Klinton,” and “thanks Olbrite” on stone walls in Tirana….Not only was a bigger death toll averted [caused], but the mission gave locals an impression of the U.S. military as savior, instead of aggressor.

This is what is meant by the term “humanitarian mission” in Libya. Muammar Qadhafi, if it’s possible, appears even more brutal and mentally disturbed than Milosevic (who was dragged off to the Hague for war crimes prosecution, and committed suicide while in custody). While Milosevic was intent [sic] on ethnic cleansing, Qadhafi has made it very clear that he intends to destroy the “rats” who dared to challenge his dictatorial regime…

So the Washington Times’ Eli Lake doesn’t know that the four-year-and-counting Milosevic trial ever took place (he “died awaiting trial“), and this one thinks he committed suicide after another day of embarrassing the prosecution. So yet again, it was Milosevic whodunnit. The “Butcher of Belgrade” responsible for every death is also responsible for butchering himself.

Such are the “reputable” journalists. If she can’t even get the widely reported official cause of death right (”heart attack”), how can we trust what she thinks she saw in Kosovo? And why would anyone listen to her stock Balkan analogies?

As for this writer’s conclusion about things likely going as swimmingly in Libya as they did in Kosovo, there was an equally, indistinguishably brilliant analysis from Max Boot, formerly of the Wall St. Journal and now naturally of the Council on Foreign Relations:

It may also be necessary to send arms and Special Forces trainers to support the rebels. Without committing any combat troops of our own, we could deliver the same kind of potent combined-arms punch that drove the Serbs out of Kosovo when NATO aircraft supported ground operations by the Kosovo Liberation Army.

The Libyan opposition movement, led by Gadhafi’s former justice minister, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, has been desperately asking for international aid in the form of a no-fly zone. If we finally delivered, you can bet that he and other Libyans would be grateful. Kosovo’s capital, Pristina, today has a major thoroughfare named Bill Clinton Boulevard crowned with a 10-foot statue of their savior.

It is not far-fetched to imagine a Barack Obama Boulevard in Tripoli if the president finally finds the courage to act. If he does not, you can bet that his name and that of the country he leads will be reviled by democrats across the region — not only in Libya.

You hear that? Muslims will be grateful! Otherwise, we risk Muslims not liking us! Somehow, the usual equation of us helping them and them not liking us isn’t going to happen this time. In fact, the whole rationale, at least early on, for helping the KLA was so they wouldn’t seek that help from extremists. Which to the KLA meant double help — from the U.S. and from extremists, crowned with 400 or so new mosques dotting Kosovo alongside Bill Clinton Boulevard, George Bush Street, Eliot Engel Blvd, Albright Avenue, William Walker Way and Bob Dole Flophouse.

As Jim Jatras responded to this opinion collective:

…In each case, an armed intervention justified as “rescuing” or “liberating” Muslims paradoxically resulted in greater Islamic rage against the United States. In each case, the hoped-for “democracy” – at least recognizable to Western eyes – eluded us. And in each case the resulting social order was more oppressively Islamic, as measured by treatment of women and non-Muslims.

For example, in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, Islamic militancy was suppressed (along with other opposition forces) and women went unveiled. Now, courtesy of U.S. taxpayers, half of Iraq’s Christian population has fled in terror from Muslim militants and women had better cover up if they know what’s good for them. Similar patterns can be discerned in the venues of other interventions, notably the near-eradication of Orthodox Christian Serbs in areas of Kosovo under the control of Muslim Albanian drug, slave, and organ-traffickers. Already in post-Mubarak Egypt constitutional “reforms” favored by the Muslim Brotherhood have been approved by referendum, and fears are rising for the future of Coptic Christians — the largest remaining Christian population in the Middle East. Aside from the serendipitous fact that Libya has few Christians to persecute, prospects for a post-Gaddafi “democracy” in that country are decidedly slim.

However, in Western thinking, the repeated failure of a policy evidently is considered insufficient grounds to abandon it. With respect to Libya, perhaps policy-makers in Washington, London, and Paris calculate that this time for sure the Muslims will love us, no matter how many of them get killed along the way. This time for sure, when Gaddafi is gone, Islamic “democracy” will look a lot like Switzerland. (Just as it has in Gaza, where “democracy” has empowered Hamas, or in purple-fingered Lebanon, now under a Hizballah-led coalition). Each time we are surprised and disappointed, but we never learn. When the Muslim Brotherhood takes power in Egypt — and in Libya, in Yemen — Power and company will also be very surprised and disappointed.

I force-fed myself the unpalatable article written this week by The Washington Times’ resident evil Jeffrey Kuhner, whose name even sounds like the Nazi currency (kuna) that the Ustashas of 1990s Croatia reintroduced. The article, published in time for Hitler’s birthday on Wednesday, was an outraged reaction to the conviction last week of Croatian General Gotovina, as well as a call for Croatia to stop cooperating with the Hague tribunal and to become even more supremacist than it already is. Meanwhile, Kuhner blames Milosevic for everything, even when it contradicts something else he blames him for. (The article is worth reading just for the sheer fun of it.) Naturally, Kuhner is free to infect Washington Times print space with his dizzyingly creative version of history, since it’s not like anyone there is going to know the difference.

But why did I make myself read it? Because of the response that the very talented college student Caleb Posner — whom we’ve met before — wrote to it. This was the note Caleb wrote me:

I just finished writing a rather lengthy response to an absurd editorial that ran in yesterday’s Washington Times….In essence, I review the unfounded notion that the Croats were innocent and the Serbs profoundly guilty in the Wars of Yugoslav Secession, pointing out the almost absurd moderation shown by Milosevic, and the inappropriate actions of the non-Serb entities.

I excerpt the historically important article below.

Croatia A Victim? Not in This Century
(Note: By “Century,” Caleb clarifies, he means the past 100 years)

Yet, as willing as the Croats were to threaten the Serbs, Milosevic provided little support to his ethnic kin in the rebel republics. The greatest evidence of this is in his handling of Bosnia, where Bosnian Serbs were at war with Croats and Bosniaks for control of their shared homeland. Following the Bosnian Serb rejection of the Vance-Owen Plan, which would have involved the surrender of substantial territory to Herzog-Bosnia (Croatian Bosnia), Milosevic imposed a blockade on the Drina in 1993, cutting off the availability of weapons and other critical resources to the VRS (Bosnian Serb Army). It is worth noting here that NATO did not first bomb Serb territory until 1995, so there was no military pressure for Milosevic to betray his own. As to the Krajina Serbs in particular, Srdja Trifkovic notes…“In Serbia however, [the Republic of Serbian Krajina] was seen as an unwanted economic and burden by Milosevic. To his frustration, the Krajina Serb assembly continued to reject his demands to settle the conflict by accepting the principle of Croatian sovereignty.”

Categorically therefore, we can conclude that Milosevic was not a hardliner bent on creating a Greater Serbia. Both his actions and his rhetoric evidence as much. On those grounds alone, one should be prepared to disregard the Kuhner article. If not, his outright hypocrisy should do the trick. Whereas he trivially asserts that Operation Storm, which essentially led to an exodus of all Krajina Serbs not killed in the initial attack, [was] a proper rebuff against the Serbs, he [condemns] supposedly similar actions taken by the Serbs. Action which he fails to fully explain, and which are not well grounded in history. And, while he faults the HDZ as “fundamentally treasonous” and hopes to see them replaced with “a new conservative party – one that will provide voters with a real patriotic-populist option,” [i.e. more hardline nationalists—since Croatians don’t have a big enough nationalism problem] he makes certain to describe Tomislav Nikolic and his Progressive Party (an offshoot of the Radical Party) as “odious,” and their popular support as troubling. More profoundly, he insists that Croatia cease its participation in the ICTY, but never indicates that other countries should do the same, implying that the Serbs should still bow before the court’s authority.

In truth, there is only one phrase in Kuhner’s article which the facts support. Namely, he is correct in describing the ICTY as “a kangaroo court.” Where he is once again in error is in insisting that it is subordinate to the whims of Serb nationalists, and has made a substantial effort to prosecute non-Serbs. The numbers tell a rather different story….

I don’t have the strength to do my own, more caustic, take-down of the Kuhner article today, but once I’ve had a chance to detox after reading it, I will.

The promoters say it will attract people from all over the world. So let me sound the warning now: PETITE BLONDS UNDER 30, BEWARE OF SLOWLY MOVING VANS. PARENTS, LOCK ANY WANDERLUSTING DAUGHTERS IN THE CLOSET.

As I wrote in 2009: Croatian Vacation: Parents, if you don’t Love your Children, take them on a Family Vacation to Croatia

American investors plan to build Las Vegas in Croatia-Istria has the best chances for this investment (April 20)

In a year or two, Croatia should get its own Las Vegas, a city of entertainment that will offer casinos, Formula 1 route, rock concerts, horse racings, top restaurants and much more. The entire project would cost 1.5 billion $. Behind this is a group of American investors from the real Las Vegas, which is visiting Croatia this week.

Istria has the best chance to get that investment. We visited several locations in Croatia, near Dubrovnik, Zadar and several locations in Istria. Istria has shown the greatest interest, and pledged that all paperwork will be solved in a few months. - said Zoran Savičić, leader of the American delegation.

Americans are hoping that the whole project could be finished [before] Croatian accession to the EU. The main promoter of the project, Michael Jenkins said that the World Las Vegas would give Croatia a great promotion worldwide, and pledged that he would personally bring a number of sports stars such as NBA basketball star Kobe Bryant.

The competition was Greece, Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania, many of which offered free land, but Croatia was chosen because of proximity to Europe, developed tourism and beautiful coastline.

Watch out, Europe.

From Yugo Kovach in Dorset, England:

Croatia owes Serbs an apology (April 19)

The late Croatian President Franjo Tudjman had every reason to think that he could get way with ridding Croatia of its pesky Krajina Serbs (“U.N. court convicts Balkan wartime hero to Croatians,” Web, Friday).

Tudjman was an apologist for the World War II Ustasha regime that was responsible for the butchery of hundreds of thousands of civilian Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia. The Serbs’ only political ambition in 1941 was to lie low given that Serbia proper was under brutal German occupation and their only crime was their national and religious identity.

When the Krajina Serbs objected to being railroaded into a Tudjman-led Croatia, most Western observers and governments accused the Serbs of unnecessarily dredging up the past.

Tudjman’s 1989 book, “Wastelands of Historical Truth,” a revisionist whitewash of the Ustasha, was dismissed as an unfortunate slip of the pen, and his proud boast during Croatia’s first free elections that his wife was neither Serbian nor Jewish was deemed a mere indiscretion. His subsequent withdrawal of the Serbs’ constitutional status as one ofCroatia’s two historical nations was brushed aside as a petty detail. No wonder the Krajina Serbs took up arms.

The Krajina Serb nation was “ethnically cleansed” in 1995. It is owed an apology, and not just by Zagreb.

Here here!

“Traitors are always exposed in the end, and in the end they are no safer and no more well-liked than the reviled nation they’ve betrayed.”

Now, I was writing about “Serbs” like Pavlovic and Simic and their betrayal of their nationhood, but look at the precise scenario above happening to a traitor of Western civilization via Israel-hatred, from Yahoo! News Alerts:

JERUSALEM (AP) Pro-Palestinian group says one of its activists apparently kidnapped by militant group in Gaza.

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) Hamas officials say body of kidnapped Italian activist found in Gaza City.

That’s where Stockholm Syndrome gets you when the kidnappers you’re siding with against civilization are Islamic. And this has happened ad nauseum to pro-Palestinian journalists, filmmakers and activists (and parents of activists) in recent years, but I think this is the first time — at least in a decade — that the Westerner was actually killed. (If you don’t count this Italian activist who was fatally stabbed when mistaken for a Jew; his father accepted the stabber’s mother’s apology that “I’m sorry — he thought your son was Israeli.”)

Here is a 2006 kidnapped-journalist timeline by MSNBC:

Since we’re on the subject again of Jews and Serbs, meanwhile, there’s been an update to the Palestinian ploy to follow the Kosovo precedent. Though actually, the Palestinians are trying to go about it more legally than the “Kosovo precedent — which was so dastardly that it should make this more legit route much easier to accomplish for the Palestinians than it might otherwise have been:

Moshe Arens Warns of ‘False Alarm’ on Palestine Statehood

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Moshe Arens warns that the Jewish state should not overreact to a threatened declaration of Palestinian statehood by the United Nations.

With U.S.-led peace talks stalled, the Palestinians have launched a campaign to seek international recognition of Palestinian statehood, and have indicated they might seek recognition from the General Assembly in the fall.

In an article published in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Arens notes that some in Israel are demanding that the country launch a “daring initiative” before the “political tsunami” of a statehood declaration strikes Israel in the fall.

But in his article headlined “Israel must not succumb to false diplomatic alarms,” Arens — who also served as Israel’s defense minister — writes, “States have never been created by U.N. declarations and never will be. For those who have forgotten, Israel was not created by U.N. resolution 181 in November 1947, but by David Ben-Gurion’s declaration of Israeli independence on May 15, 1948, and by the [Israeli Defense Force’s] ability to take and control the areas of the new state.

“A U.N. declaration, whether at the Security Council or the General Assembly, recognizing a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital . . . will be no more effective than Security Council resolution 1701, which prohibited Hezbollah from military operations in southern Lebanon, or General Assembly resolution 3379, which equated Zionism with racism.

“If this latest declaration is actually passed, it will merely serve as another reminder of the impotence of the United Nations and its irrelevance when it comes to dealing with international conflicts.”

Any real settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must include an end to hostilities and a capability on the part of the Palestinians of assuring that no acts of terror will be launched from territories that Israel turns over as part of the agreement, Arens states.

“The current Palestinian spokesman, or president if you like, Mahmoud Abbas, is not capable of satisfying either of these conditions,” Arens says.

“He certainly cannot be relied on to prevent acts of terror against Israel from those areas Israel would withdraw from.”

He adds: “Only when it is clear that the Israeli government is standing firm on its positions will the pressure on Israel be relaxed.”

Israeli President Shimon Peres echoed Arens’ sentiments in a recent discussion with diplomats at the International Peace Institute.

Regarding the possible U.N. declaration, Peres said: “I don’t believe this is a solution, because in order for the Palestinians to have independence, we have to give back land. And as we are ready to give back land, we expect that we shall guarantee [security for] our own people. We cannot have a crossfire from Gaza and the West Bank.”

How could The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board have let this pass? Clearly, sports writer Tom Perrotta didn’t get approval from the proper channels before accidentally writing this not-at-all-negative article about tennis champion Novak Djokovic. Yeah, he’s a star, but he’s a…sssssssssssSerb! And the WSJ really, really, really, really, really, really, really, doesn’t like those.

The editorial page needs to rein the sports section in, obviously. Djokovic isn’t exactly quiet about wanting to keep Serbia whole, so let’s brace ourselves for an annoyed-sounding editorial to make up for this sports desk transgression — asking: If this Serbianationalist ™ is in such great physical shape, shouldn’t his organs be available on the market by now from Our Friends the Albanians?

The only snipe that Perrotta couldn’t resist including was “…the image of teens dodging bombs while practicing backhands is exaggerated…”

Easy to say for someone who wasn’t dealing with this:

Dervisevic remembers the difficulties in keeping the centre open. “When the bombing began we shut down for three days, but after that we decided that we should continue as normal,” he says. “We were open every day. One day a power station just 400 metres from here was hit by a bomb. All the windows here were blown out. It was a horrifying experience, but we carried on. We wanted to keep things as normal as possible for the children. I think the experience gave us all strength.”

Ivanovic was one of those who tried to keep her training routine going as bombs exploded around the city. “I would say those were the toughest times,” she recalled. “It was very hard. It went on for three months. It was very hard to practise, and we couldn’t at the start of the bombing. Later on we got used to it. We would practise at seven in the morning and try to live as normal lives as possible.”

Next Page »