January 04th 2017 10:52:50 PM
This is the gay Hunter College professor who harassed and tried to intimidate Ivanka Trump and her babies at the airport two weeks ago. (Apparently breaking his own rule of staying away from pretty girls.) Look at this nebbish! Good thing he’s gay.
In related news, a bunch of artists whose paintings Ivanka has are actually doing the kindergarten thing and telling her to take their work off her walls. While Ivanka is otherwise perfect (in my view), her taste in art could use work, and I would therefore agree that she should take down these children’s “work,” which looks like splatter and finger paint. Check it out:
The group of New York artists is called Halt Action Group, and their website reads: “Dear Ivanka, we need to talk about your dad. Racism, anti-Semitism, misogyny, and homophobia are not acceptable anywhere — least of all in the White House….Talk of a Muslim registry has no place in the White House.”
Now, maybe one day someone will explain to me how a registry for Jew-killers and gay-killers amounts to anti-Semitism and homophobia, but in the meantime, look at the intellectual level of the “Dear Ivanka” cards that the group is having people fill out in front of her apartment:
Join the club. Muslims are killing everyone. (I’d say, “Not fun when the shoe’s on the other foot, huh,” but then I’d be equating trying to prevent Muslims from killing, to Muslims killing.)
I must emphasize how mystified I am not just over the “anti-Semitism” charge against Trump, but the homophobia charge. What evidence is there that he has anything against gays? But then I’m reminded that it’s not enough to not have anything against gays. Nor even to accept them. You have to actually love and celebrate them. They require your devotion. And when it comes to the gay agenda, whatever its full range may be, they require your submission.
This of course starts to sound a lot like those folks who want gays dead. The ones whom the gays defend so passionately. Submission-demanding Islam. This would make no sense at all, unless the sacred cow that’s being protected is a common political M.O. (Let’s dub the Gay/Islam phenomenon ‘Gayslam.’) Do I really need to write an obvious article that draws out just how similar their legal, political, cultural, medial, semantic, and psychological methods have been?